Etiquette Consulting Inc

Tools to help you avoid Social Faux Pas

In a world where image is everything, you must make your brand stand out in order to attain your goals.

Jules Hirst, Etiquette Expert

1st Amendment and Etiquette… Only in the U.S

Last week, con­ser­v­a­tive polit­i­cal com­men­ta­tor, Ann Coul­ter, had a speech can­celled at the Uni­ver­sity of Ottawa because of pro­tes­tors and I couldn’t stop think­ing about it. Which side was right? Should the speech have been cancelled?

The job of a polit­i­cal com­men­ta­tor is to not only get your point across but also to make sure that point is remem­bered. Ann Coul­ter makes some out­ra­geous com­ments. Does she believe them? Absolutely. Could she word them dif­fer­ently? Prob­a­bly, but then you wouldn’t be remem­bered and in com­men­tary, con­tro­versy sells.

The Uni­ver­sity of Ottawa invited Coul­ter to speak on cam­pus. By extend­ing the invi­ta­tion, the uni­ver­sity should have been aware of Coulter’s rep­u­ta­tion for out­ra­geous com­ments and been pre­pared for it. In fact, a mem­ber of the aca­d­e­mic coun­sel sent Coul­ter a let­ter to remind her that Canada has laws regard­ing hate speech and she could face charges for her com­ments. So, obvi­ously some­one was aware what might be said.

When going to a for­eign coun­try, you need to be respect­ful of their laws and cus­toms. Liv­ing in Amer­ica, we take our free­doms and the first amend­ment for granted. When we leave the coun­try, we must remem­ber that these free­doms and pro­tec­tions do not go with us and we must abide by the rules and laws of the coun­try we are vis­it­ing. Ann Coul­ter should have been aware of this when she accepted the invi­ta­tion and real­ized that she should tone down her speech to be within the law.

Col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties should encour­age ideas and be places where dif­fer­ent view­points and opin­ions can be expressed. By can­celling the speech, the Uni­ver­sity of Ottawa did just the oppo­site. They were guilty of cen­sor­ship. They used the guise of safety – because of the pro­tes­tors it wouldn’t be safe for Ann Coul­ter to speak – and decided to cen­sor her opinions.

So, who is right? The school should have known what they were get­ting when they booked Ann Coul­ter. Ann Coul­ter should have known about the Cana­dian laws and pre­pared accord­ingly. Did she? Prob­a­bly not because if she were charged, it would add to her publicity.

 In the end, I think the Uni­ver­sity of Ottawa and its stu­dents are the losers. The pro-Coulter stu­dents lost because they didn’t get to hear her speech. The anti-Coulter stu­dents lost because they cen­sored free speech and obvi­ously have learned noth­ing in their stud­ies – unless they’re major­ing in run­ning dic­ta­tor­ships. Finally, the school lost because they tried to shut down Ann Coul­ter and have only made her stronger. After all this con­tro­versy, Ann Coul­ter keeps her name in the news and the requests for her appear­ances keep rolling in. Her books keep sell­ing and her bank account keeps ris­ing. Well played Uni­ver­sity of Ottawa.

What do you think? Would love to hear your thoughts.…

www.forajulproductions.com

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...